DEW POINT

This information was provided by Paroscientific, Inc. Precision Pressure Instrumentation. Summary

This report describes the calculations required for determining the dew point temperature, using the measured temperature of the RTD sensor and relative humidity sensor. The algorithm is based on the Magnus-Tetens formula, over the range

0° C < T < 60° C

0.01 < RH < 1.00

0° C < Td < 50° C

where T is the measured temperature [°C]

RH is the measured relative humidity

and Td is the calculated dew point temperature [°C]

The dew point temperature is

(1)
(2)
with a = 17.27
and b=237.7 [°C]

The uncertainty in the calculated dew point temperature is ±0.4° C.

Background

The measured atmospheric pressure is the sum of two terms, the partial pressure of dry air (pa) and the partial pressure of water vapor (pw). The water vapor pressure is a function of temperature, and the dew point temperature (Td), which is defined as the temperature at which the air is saturated with water vapor.

Given the measured temperature (T) and the measured relative humidity (RH), it is possible to calculate the dew point temperature. The present calculation limits the dew point to values above freezing. This provides for a more efficient calculation, although over a limited range.

Dew Point Calculation

Definition & Limits

T The measured temperature of the RTD sensor; 0° C < T < 60° C

Td The calculated dew point temperature; 0° C < Td < 50° C

RH The measured relative humidity of the RH sensor; 0.01 < RH < 1.00

pws The vapor saturation pressure

pw The vapor pressure

Derivation The Magnus-Tetens formula for the vapor pressure is given by [1]

with a=17.27

b=237.7

and Td is in °C.

The vapor pressure is related to the relative humidity and vapor saturation pressure by

When the air is saturated the relative humidity is equal to 100%, and the temperature is equal to the dew point temperature, which allows us to solve for the dew point temperature.

where

Uncertainty of Dew Point Temperature

The uncertainty in the measured dew point temperature is a function of the measured temperature and relative humidity and the uncertainties associated with those measurements.

The uncertainty in the measured dew point temperature is

where s2Td is the uncertainty in the calculated dew point temperature

s2T is the uncertainty in the measured temperature

s2RH is the uncertainty in the measured relative humidity

and assuming no cross-correlated uncertainties.

Taking the appropriate derivatives and collecting the terms, we find the uncertainty in the calculated dew point temperature to be

Letting the parameters be

T = 60° C, temperature range

RH=1.00 (100%), relative humidity range

sT = 0.1° C, uncertainty in the measured temperature

sRH = 0.02 (2%), uncertainty in the measured relative humidity

we calculate the one sigma uncertainty in the dew point temperature

sTd =0.4 deg C


NWS Birmingham, AL - Heat Index

HEAT INDEX

The information on this website was provided by National Weather Service of Birmingham, AL

www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx

Heat index or HI is sometimes referred to as the "apparent Temperature". The HI, given in degrees F, is a measure of how hot it feels when relative humidity (RH) is added to the actual air temperature.

The following equation approximates the heat index. There are many assumptions made produce this, far too many to list here. The equation was obtain by multiple regression analysis and there is a ±1.3 degree °F error.

HI = -42.379 + 2.04901523T + 10.1433127R - 0.22475541TR - 6.83783x10 -3 T 2 - 5.481717x10 -2 R 2
+ 1.22874x10 -3 T 2R + 8.5282x10 -4 TR 2 - 1.99x10 -6 T 2 R 2

where

T = ambient dry bulb temperature degrees Fahrenheit
R = relative humidity

The equation is only useful for temperatures 80 degrees or higher, and relative humidities 40% or greater.

The previous table was outdated and has been replaced by the following. Thanks to Lans Rothfusz, MIC at NWS Tulsa, OK for the following table.

HEAT INDEX °F (°C)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
Temp. 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
110
(47)
136
(58)
108
(43)
130
(54)
137
(58)
106
(41)
124
(51)
130
(54)
137
(58)
104
(40)
119
(48)
124
(51)
131
(55)
137
(58)
102
(39)
114
(46)
119
(48)
124
(51)
130
(54)
137
(58)
100
(38)
109
(43)
114
(46)
118
(48)
124
(51)
129
(54)
136
(58)
98
(37)
105
(41)
109
(43)
113
(45)
117
(47)
123
(51)
128
(53)
134
(57)
96
(36)
101
(38)
104
(40)
108
(42)
112
(44)
116
(47)
121
(49)
126
(52)
132
(56)
94
(34)
97
(36)
100
(38)
103
(39)
106
(41)
110
(43)
114
(46)
119
(48)
124
(51)
129
(54)
135
(57)
92
(33)
94
(34)
96
(36)
99
(37)
101
(38)
105
(41)
108
(42)
112
(44)
116
(47)
121
(49)
126
(52)
131
(55)
90
(32)
91
(33)
93
(34)
95
(35)
97
(36)
100
(38)
103
(39)
106
(41)
109
(43)
113
(45)
117
(47)
122
(50)
127
(53)
132
(56)
88
(31)
88
(31)
89
(32)
91
(33)
93
(34)
95
(35)
98
(37)
100
(38)
103
(39)
106
(41)
110
(43)
113
(45)
117
(47)
121
(49)
86
(30)
85
(29)
87
(31)
88
(31)
89
(32)
91
(33)
93
(34)
95
(35)
97
(36)
100
(38)
102
(39)
105
(41)
108
(42)
112
(44)
84
(29)
83
(28)
84
(29)
85
(29)
86
(30)
88
(31)
89
(32)
90
(32)
92
(33)
94
(34)
96
(36)
98
(37)
100
(38)
103
(39)
82
(28)
81
(27)
82
(28)
83
(28)
84
(29)
84
(29)
85
(29)
86
(30)
88
(31)
89
(32)
90
(32)
91
(33)
93
(34)
95
(35)
80
(27)
80
(27)
80
(27)
81
(27)
81
(27)
82
(28)
82
(28)
83
(28)
84
(29)
84
(29)
85
(29)
86
(30)
86
(30)
87
(31)

Category Heat Index Possible heat disorders for people in high risk groups
Extreme
Danger
130°F or higher
(54°C or higher)
Heat stroke or sunstroke likely.
Danger 105 - 129°F
(41 - 54°C)
Sunstroke, muscle cramps, and/or heat exhaustion likely. Heatstroke possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity.
Extreme
Caution
90 - 105°F
(32 - 41°C)
Sunstroke, muscle cramps, and/or heat exhaustion possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity.
Caution 80 - 90°F
(27 - 32°C)
Fatigue possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity.


Temperature/RH Smart Sensors

HOBO Weather Station
glossary/Temperature-RH Smart Sensor

Information on this page was provided by Onset Computer Corporation.

Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products.

Features
Measurement range: -40° to +75°C (-40° to +167°F)
0 to 100% RH between 0° to +50°C (+32° to +122°F)
Operating Range: RH sensor will provide readings -40° to 75°C (-40° to 167°F), but accuracy specification only applies within the specified measurement range.
Accuracy: ±0.7°C @ +25°C (±1.3°F @ +77°F); ±3% RH over the range of 0° to +50°C; ±4% in condensing environments
Resolution: 0.4°C @ +25°C (0.7°F at +77°F); 0.5% RH @ +25°C (+77°F)
Drift: Temp: <0.1° C (0.2°F) per year; RH: ±1% RH per year, factory RH recalibration available
Response time: Temp: 8 minutes typical; RH: 5 minutes typical (both in 2 meter/second airflow)
Housing: Stainless steel
Dimensions: 1.6 cm x 8.9 cm (5/8" x 3 1/2")
Approximate Weight: 60 g (2 oz), 140 g (5 oz), 370 g (13 oz); weight varies with cable length
Cable Lengths: 2 meter, 6 meter, 17 meter (6.5', 20', 56')
Note: Sensor requires protection from rain or direct splashing; Radiation shield strongly recommended for use in sunlight; sensors can be used in intermittent condensing environments up to +30°C and non-condensing above +30°C.

Wind chill Factors

The information on this page was provided by Canada/U.S. METAR--Mutations of the International Standards and Gene Nygaard.

Wind chill factors are supposed to measure the effect of the combination of temperature and wind speed on human comfort. It is important to remember that these do not have the same effect on inanimate objects, or even on other animals or on plants. Nor is this effect felt by humans who are sheltered from the wind.

Wind chill factors can be expressed as an equivalent temperature on either the Celsius or Fahrenheit scale, or in units of power per unit area. In Canada, wind chill factors are often reported as heat loss in watts per square metre.

Wind chill factors are often published as tables. There are many such published tables here in the U.S., and most of them don't agree exactly on all the equivalents.

Calculations

The variations in various tables that have been published may be the result of use of different formulas for heat loss or different assumptions for skin temperature or calm wind speed, though many are round-off errors from conversions among the various units used along the way. As near as I can figure out, both the U.S. and Canada us an old wind chill formula developed by Paul Siple in the 1930s.

Start with a formula for heat loss, given the air temperature and wind speed. This is Siple's formula:

H = (10.45 + 10×sqrt(v) - v)×(33 - t)

where H is in kilocalories per square metre-hour (kcal/(m²·h), and t is air temperature in degrees Celsius and wind speed v is in metres per second, and the 33 °C factor is based on human skin temperature. To convert this to the modern units of watts per square metre, which are used in Canada, multiply the result by 4184 J/kcal and 1 h/3600 s and 1 W s/J. (Note that 4184/3600 is about 1.162, and you can multiply by this number; the above shows where this number comes from.) Or, using the same units for t and v, change the formula to:
H (in W/m²) = (12.1452 + 11.6222×sqrt(v) -1.16222×v)×(33 - t)
[NOTE: constants change if other units used for t or v]

To get the equivalent temperature that is usually used in the U.S., the heat loss at the given temperature and wind speed is calculated, and then the temperature is calculated which would give the same heat loss at a low (but not zero) wind speed. In the U.S. and Canada the speed used for this is 4 statute miles per hour (1.78816 m/s). A formula that will do this is the following, where s equals the skin temperature, either 33 °C or the same temperature on the Fahrenheit scale, 91.4 °F, with the result in the same type of degrees:

equivalent temp. = s - (s - t)×(0.474266 + b×sqrt(v) + c×v)

where the constants b and c depend on the units in which the wind speed v is measured:

      units               b               c
       m/s            0.453843       -0.0453843
       km/h           0.239196       -0.0126067
       kt             0.325518       -0.0233477
       mi/h           0.303444       -0.0202886

I have carried my factors to 6 significant digits, which probably isn't really necessary, except to provide consistent results no matter what units are used for t, v, or H. These will most likely be used in a program or a spreadsheet anyway, so all the numbers won't have to be entered for each calculation. If you want to round the results to a whole number of degrees using an INT function, be careful how that function works with negative numbers; some round to the next lower number and some to the number closer to zero. For example, to calculate equivalent temperature in the degrees used for t and for t in °C and v in km/h, use:
teq = 33 - (33 - t)×(0.474266+0.239196×sqrt(v) - 0.0126067×v)

for t in °F and v in knots, use:
teq = 91.4 - (91.4 - t)×(0.474266 + 0.325518×sqrt(v) - 0.0233477× v)

IMPORTANT NOTE: These wind chill formulas are not valid at all for wind speeds outside the range from 1.78816 m/s to 25 m/s (90 km/h, 55.9 mi/h, 48.6 kt). If you write a program to calculate wind chills, change all speeds higher than 25 m/s to 25 m/s and all speeds lower than 4 mi/h to 4 mi/h.

To convert between heat loss in watts per square metre and equivalent temperatures, use these formulas:

    H = 1300.3 - 14.227 teqF
    teqF = 91.4 - 0.0703 H

    H = 845.1 - 25.608 teqC
    teqC = 33 - 0.03905 H
The formula the National Weather Service uses to compute wind chill is:

T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T - 91.4) + 91.4

T(wc) is the wind chill, V is in the wind speed in statute miles per hour and T is the temperature in degrees Fahrenheit.

The formula to calculate a Celsius wind chill using V as the wind speed in kilometers per hour and T in degrees Celsius is:

T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V) (T - 33) + 33

These two formulas don't quite agree with each other. For the Fahrenheit-miles per hour formula, the 0.0817 is the reciprocal of the heat loss (in the obsolete kcal/(m²·h)) per degree Fahrenheit for a wind speed of 4 mi/h. Doing it this way, rounding off this number and each of the other three variables to 3 significant digits each, introduces more roundoff error than my formulas above which only round off after what is rounded off to 0.0817 by NWS is multiplied by the other numbers. I haven't checked for sure, but I think that this simpler version would be truer to the original formula than the one listed by USA Today: (following their order of elements and notation here)
T(wc) = (0.3V**0.5 + 0.474 - 0.02V)(T - 91.4) + 91.4